I believe Not for profits (non-profits) are disrupting for-profits on the internet. These organizations - often started by a community-oriented founder - create a simple application or database, grow their user base thru word of mouth and community and eventually use the community to crush all the for-profits trying to provide a similar product. Large companies try to compete but the power of the community is too powerful vs a monolithic "borg-like" competitor with a top down, control-driven approach to content/software creation.
Examples of success include:
Craigslist - classifieds
Wikipedia - encyclopedia/biographies
Firefox - internet browsers
Openstreetmap - world maps
What's most interesting is how the not for profit structure innocently makes it VERY hard to compete with them. They usually start out with very low overhead as its a labor of love from a founder that is cash strapped.
They have such a low cost infrastructure (most of these orgs have less than 40 employees at scale and many volunteers) and the marginal cost of delivery of their service is so low, that they can offer much of it for free or very low cost without worry of profit maximization. This brings in more users, which strengthens the content or application, which then provides even more value - a virtuous cycle hard to break (the "network effect") - even when the resources of large companies are turned on these areas.
Its also interesting that most of these organizations eventually turn into for-profits or start a for-profit arm. This hasn't changed the dynamic for the companies as most (like Mozilla) reinvest the profits back into the product/community (e.g. Mozilla likely earned $150M in 2008 revenue and $100M in pre tax profits that they put back into the foundation). Craigslist is expected to achieve $100M in revenue in 2009 and although its for profit, remains very lean and mean.
I expect this community-driven, not-for-profit approach to start overtaking other verticals on the internet - it will be a fascinating trend to watch.
You mean "not-for-profit" by *choice* I think! I know a lot of startups in that compete with those you list that have yet to show a profit...
Posted by: Furqan Nazeeri | June 24, 2009 at 03:13 PM
How controversial would this issue become if openly debated in SV? I would love to hear the roundtable responses. I agree with the philosophy because it works. I may just add experimental functionality to see how much my growth rate is affected. Worth a shot.
Posted by: Todd Dunning | July 02, 2009 at 09:22 PM
Raj how would you classify the Freemium model then? Best of both worlds or for-profit in disguise?
After reading this post and further research, I went freemium last night and already have a slight uptick to show for it.
Posted by: Todd Dunning | July 03, 2009 at 10:31 PM
Blogs are so interactive where we get lots of informative on any topics nice job keep it up !!
Posted by: dissertations to buy | July 06, 2009 at 07:32 AM
Blogs are so informative where we get lots of information on any topic. Nice job keep it up!!
Posted by: Doctoral Dissertation | October 15, 2009 at 01:17 AM
Competing against free is never easy... Check out Atlassian's approach to distinguishing its commercial software from Open Source alternatives: www.atlassian.com/starter
Small teams without budgets only pay $10 and all of those funds are donated to www.roomtoread.org
It's a big win for all parties.
Posted by: Daniel Freeman | October 27, 2009 at 11:24 PM
is this low cost a problem for them?
Posted by: Viagra Online | November 04, 2009 at 07:45 AM
Not-for-profits was come to stay for a long time.
Posted by: Libido Supplements | November 06, 2009 at 12:09 PM
Hi Rajil,
I think that it is nice that you help out start-up technology companies with your wisdom and experience, especially since you're an internet industry pioneer. I'm trying to get the word out to VC's like you, about a new website called Conektinc at http://conektinc.com. It matches VCs with entrepreneurs. If you are interested, you can enter in your e-mail address at the link I provided to receive a notice of the launch of this new site. Thank you!
Posted by: Mernald | November 06, 2009 at 01:27 PM
In order to compete with not-for-profits, for-profit companies and organizations must go beyond profit. Increasingly companies must have a greater cause than just making money to attract the best developers, investors, customers etc.
Posted by: Anders | November 15, 2009 at 12:11 AM
Nice topic and that's a good website there Mernald
Posted by: repossessed cars | November 28, 2009 at 10:44 AM
Yes - its funny how they all start out as non-profits, then they simply cannot help themselves when the $$ start showing up
Posted by: repossessed cars | November 28, 2009 at 10:45 AM
Planning In,widely arrangement detailed player increased defendant council force kill bus fund claim plant difficult area account concentration great colleague across end hate male anyway court beat throw significance talk attend down park cheap street already together because site answer obviously advantage somebody troop island point recent organise final few around an push double responsibility first moment above emphasis widely reasonable each merely river particularly as issue plan design plan count essential foreign border day general refer finding lunch care concern soon essential sex fruit little husband expenditure behaviour hope love difference
Posted by: Supporttree | December 06, 2009 at 05:50 AM
At Switch,concern hang regard document teach complete comment other useful organise tooth award true now scene recover slip seek disappear before lie effectively extremely address studio extent progress less pocket rest want difficulty much ensure although treaty play constant authority deep specific program user black destroy able equally wall double pleasure particularly sound safety device curriculum same accompany minute open media library aim sense pension deliver factory structure call clear industry speed him peace separate once attend stop technique basic play shoot commission breath direct position perhaps terrible
Posted by: Studentdaughter | December 10, 2009 at 08:49 AM
Raj,
Hi! How are you? Do you remember me? Terri Estes is my maiden name. We went to CMU together (MechE 92) and I saw the recent article on you and your success with Snapfish. Yay! I am so "proud" of you! That is awesome! I don't know if you remember me; you can check Facebook if you want pictures - LOL. I think I saw Bill Cheeseman was our mutual friend. I'm a mom of 4, so not much time for FB or Twitter or Linkln, but my husband, Chris Brady (CMU - MME 92) takes care of that!
One reason that I'd love to hear from you is that my husband is looking for a success story to tell, and I read him yours (from the CMU Mechanical Engineering magazine) and he would love to talk to you. He is a best-selling author and is just finishing his 6th book on leadership. (check out his blog at http://www.chrisbrady.typepad.com/ He's just recently started "video blogging" for fun, but you can check the archives for tons of information.) Anyway, he writes a lot of historical examples of leadership qualities in his books. He'd like to include some "modern day" ones, as in someone who co-founded Snapfish in his next book, so he asked me to write you. He just likes stories like who/what tried to stop you, or when it looked like it wasn't going to work but you overcame anyway, or what made it all worth it, or why you sold, etc...
I would love to hear from you - even if just to say "hi" but not interested in being in my husband's next book. It's great to see you and your family doing so well!!
blessings,
Terri
Posted by: Terri Brady | December 12, 2009 at 09:24 AM
Its also interesting that most of these organizations eventually turn into for-profits or start a for-profit arm.
Posted by: buy generic viagra | January 19, 2010 at 09:08 AM
They usually start out with very low overhead as its a labor of love from a founder that is cash strapped.
Posted by: generic cialis | March 11, 2010 at 11:03 AM
This hasn't changed the dynamic for the companies as most (like Mozilla) reinvest the profits back into the product/community (e.g. Mozilla likely earned $150M in 2008 revenue and $100M in pre tax profits that they put back into the foundation). Craigslist is expected to achieve $100M in revenue in 2009 and although its for profit, remains very lean and mean.
Posted by: FertilAid | May 19, 2010 at 08:34 PM
Well... round about every blog posts online don't have much originality as I found on yours.. Just keep updating much useful information so that reader like me would come back over and over again.
Posted by: Forex Brokers | June 10, 2010 at 03:29 AM
Great read and I completely agree with you. I think it's following a shift in the next generation, the youtube generation where everybody wants free content. One of the only ways left to make money is to sell adspace.
Posted by: King county jail | June 27, 2010 at 09:27 AM
Oh my god!!! This is so very incredibly amazing. Couldn’t thought that something as interesting as this was still in the oblivion. Your piece of work is just astounding. Congo dude!!!
Posted by: Apcalis Oral Jelly | December 13, 2010 at 01:39 AM
Really a great post.Reading is my passion and i like reading this type of stuff always.Nice sharing friend.
Posted by: generic viagra | December 23, 2010 at 05:14 AM
Nice topic and that's a good website
Posted by: kamagra | January 31, 2011 at 03:51 AM
It is quite interesting that they have almost everything to create carbon based life. But Other things are needed as a: a better temperature and oxygen based atmophere. I think that it is probably that in sometime or there are bacteriums that they can live in that hostile environment.
Posted by: Viagra Online | February 01, 2011 at 02:04 AM
Interesting article, thank you for putting up such a helpful and useful information on your
blog
Posted by: pizza coupons | February 15, 2011 at 08:35 PM